© 2020 – 2023 AEA3 WEB | AEAƎ United Kingdom News
AEA3 WEB | AEAƎ United Kingdom News
News

Experts unconvinced by Lord Sumption’s lockdown ethics

Critics of retired supreme court justice say QALYs measure not intended for public health debate

Seven years before Lord Sumption found himself at the centre of a media storm over his apparent suggestion that the life of a woman with stage 4 cancer was “less valuable”, the former supreme court justice wrote a judgment that seemed to take a very different view.

In 2014, addressing the Tony Nicklinson case in a decision which upheld a ban on doctors helping patients to end their lives, he called the sanctity of life a “fundamental moral value”.

Continue reading…

Related posts

Ukraine is pessimistic about joining Nato, ahead of summit in Vilnius

AEA3

Ben Wallace rules himself out for PM and suggests he would back Johnson

AEA3

Chesterfield couple guilty of ‘brutal’ Christmas Day murder of baby son

AEA3

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This